🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.